Lambda School and Outcomes Reporting

May 19, 2021

I’ve been frustrated over the past week reading articles describing the claims of three students who are pursuing arbitration claims against Lambda School. While we strive to create a great experience for every student at Lambda School, we recognize that student complaints, including lawsuits, are inevitable for any school that trains thousands of students each year. However, these cases have generated attention that unfairly questions the integrity and accomplishments of Lambda School and its people by suggesting we have intentionally misled students about the outcomes for those who attend.

I want to be clear: this criticism is categorically false. **We’ve always tried our hardest to paint a clear and accurate picture of the range and likelihood of outcomes for students who successfully complete our programs. **

I find the recent articles particularly** **upsetting because the persistent focus on three complaints risks overshadowing the more than 2000 students we’ve helped land in great, often life-changing, jobs since Lambda School started.

I’m equally frustrated because the criticism fails to acknowledge that the current higher education system generally imposes no obligation on schools to ensure students will have adequate means to pay back tuition. If a student doesn’t land a job after attending a traditional university, they have essentially no recourse for the thousands of dollars of debt they have incurred. In the case of Lambda School, such a result is actually impossible. When using an Income Share Agreement (ISA) or CA Retail Installment Contract (RIC), students ** only** pay tuition

The basis of the recent claims against Lambda School is that we intentionally misled prospective students about our outcomes in early 2018. This confusion dates back to a document that Lambda School shared with investors in 2018 that was improperly reported and misinterpreted by the press. Others have subsequently parroted the same assertion without performing their own analyses or taking the time to understand the data.

When talking about student outcomes the important thing to start with is, “What question are you trying to answer?” There are many different ways to measure student outcomes, and depending on what question you’re asking you’ll get a different answer.

Sports statistics offer a good analogy. Those who are sports fans are used to analysts presenting data in many different ways to answer slightly different questions about player performance. For example, a batter in baseball will have both a “batting average” and a “slugging percentage.” Both are measures of how well a player performs, but use different formulas to answer different questions. The average fan would look mostly at batting average, while a scout or coach would look at batting average, slugging percentage, and many other metrics in determining a lineup.

The same is true for measuring educational outcomes – there are many different ways to look at the same data, and you’ll get different answers depending on which question you’re trying to answer.

Take a hypothetical cohort of 100 students.

100 students enroll

75 students graduate

65 students are hired by employers

50 students are hired with a salary high enough to begin repayment

Nearly every school will produce an outcomes report that shows two numbers:

- Graduation percentage (75/100 = 75%)
- Placement percentage within 180 days (65/75 = 86.67%)

These answer the most common questions students have: “If I enroll in the school, what is the likelihood that I graduate?” “If I graduate and look for a job, what is the likelihood that I get a job in a reasonable amount of time?” Perhaps most specifically, students are wondering, “What is the likelihood I have to pay tuition without achieving a positive outcome?”

An *investor* in Lambda School, however, is trying to answer a different question. Investors are most interested in the sustainability of the school, and want to know: If Lambda School covers the costs of 100 students, what percentage are likely to begin payment in a short amount of time?

In this instance the answer would be 50% (50/100 = 50%).

All of the above numbers are accurate answers to different questions using correct information.

Allegations that Lambda School intentionally misled prospective students about outcomes stem from people looking at *different* measures Lambda School designed to measure *different* things, and pointing out that the numbers are not the same. They assert that because those numbers are different Lambda School lied. That’s not true. They are different numbers that precisely and accurately answer different questions.

To make sure that we are consistent when sharing outcomes data publicly we do so in reports that publish not only the data itself but also the associated methodology. More recently, we enlisted a prominent outside accounting firm to audit our reports. When we discuss outcomes data we generally do so by referring back to the most recent public report until the next report is produced. Because of the length of the Lambda School program and the time needed to support graduates’ job search, we publish reports every 6-12 months. We believe this provides the richest and most accurate picture of student outcomes and is consistent with the few other schools that also share data publicly.

We know Lambda School is not perfect and will always be a work in progress. For a school, we're young and we're constantly trying new things to see what helps our students find their fastest path to a great job. We know that there will always be some students who don’t have a great experience; it’s the reality for every school everywhere, and we welcome feedback.

At the same time, we hear almost every day from Lambda School graduates who thank us for changing their lives by helping them to qualify for high-paying jobs that they would never have been able to get on their own. These students recognize that Lambda School has taken a risk on them, by offering them training and placement at no upfront cost in exchange for their promise that if they find a high paying job they will “pay it forward" under the terms of the ISA (or RIC) to help others receive the same opportunity.

I’m grateful for their support and proud of what we have accomplished. I know we will only get better and better. Thank you to all of those doing so much work to make incentive-aligned tuition possible.

Want to learn more? Leave your details:

Get 4 weeks of engineering at no cost.

We'll pay them for you. Learn more

Become a Full Stack Engineer in 6 months

Learn more

Become a Data Scientist in 6 months

Learn more

Meet our instructors at Lambda's online events

See upcoming events

Meet our instructors at a virtual event

See upcoming admission events

Become a Backend Developer in 9 months

Learn more

Is Backend the right course for you?

Take our quiz

Is Full Stack the right course for you?

Take our quiz

Quiz: Which course is right for you?

Take the quiz

Quiz: Which course is right for you?

Take the quiz

Start learning to code for free

See our free online mini course

Start learning to code for free

See our free online mini course

33% of our students are underrepresented minorities.

See Diversity at Lambda

33% of our students are underrepresented minorities.

See Diversity at Lambda

Browse our graduates available for hire.

See all

Browse our graduates available for hire.

See all

Is Data Science the right course for you?

Take our quiz